🔗 Share this article Prosperous Period for US Billionaires: How the System Perpetuates Wealth Inequality Among countless Americans, the economic climate over the past five years has been tough. Expenses have soared while wages remains unchanged. Steep mortgage rates have made homeownership a dismal prospect. The unemployment rate has been gradually increasing. The majority of individuals have reported they're postponing major life decisions, including raising children or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the last five years couldn't have been more prosperous. The Billionaire Boom The wealth of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even throughout all the financial uncertainty, the stock market has only kept rising. This increase has mostly helped just a tiny percentage of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth. Despite the imbalance as this allocation seems, it's the financial structure working as it is currently designed. "Affluent individuals have bought their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," stated economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now moving into this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are preying on the system of inequality." Understanding Wealth Tiers To help others comprehend what exactly it means to be "affluent" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Wealthville" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville. To contemporize the concept, Collins categorizes these "affluence districts" based on income levels: At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a family earnings of at least $110,000 and an total assets of over $1.5m. The villages get more exclusive as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m. Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m. Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth. Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically. "You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins said. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really separate reality. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set." Extreme Affluence Consequences The summit in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's most affluent. The control that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply wealthy, let alone the average American who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all. But Collins thinks the activist mantra "billionaires shouldn't exist" misses the point and has a "whiff of exterminism" to it. "It's the separation between private conduct and a structure of regulations," Collins said. "We should be worried about an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires." Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: acquiring fortune, protecting assets, political capture and hyper-extraction. When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think exclusively about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town. But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes. "Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as financial instruments, foreign deposits, anonymous shell companies, philanthropic entities and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes. Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs political support. Wealth of over $40m translates to political power, Collins says, and can be used to defend wealth and protect its accumulation. The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "hyper extraction" to describe how the wealthy have come to influence nearly every single part of an Americans' routine activities largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to invest in private companies. "Private equity is looking for those sectors of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we squeeze money out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs." The Real Consequences The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any substantial income improvement. And Collins said the suffering and anger of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest. "The most powerful oligarchs understand people are being left behind [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at accessing a potent "false common-man appeal". Political Reality The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a series of billionaires to government roles. Along with wealthy entrepreneurs who had temporary but significant roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires. This political landscape, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations. The Path Forward While political parties continue to argue that immigration and unfavorable commercial treaties are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the opposing party, which has also been controlled by the billionaires and big money, be able to effectively tackle the underlying harms?" Collins said. Progressive politicians, he argues, know what policies are needed to "alter economic flow", including deep changes to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and empowering worker groups. "It was so, so close, and the law really did embody the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to address some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Wealthy influence is not about building so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the institutional knowledge is there. We know what that looks like." Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort. "It may be sooner than expected that the tide turns, and then it really is about maintaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this severe disparity we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is solvable."